kanotix.com :: Thema anzeigen - ***X-Org*** updated,gcc not happy [or ati]::fix::

kanotix.com

General Support - ***X-Org*** updated,gcc not happy [or ati]::fix::

etorix - 09.06.2006, 06:35 Uhr
Titel: ***X-Org*** updated,gcc not happy [or ati]::fix::

do, before the scriptname

Code:

CC=gcc-4.0 install-nvidia-debian.sh

*BreakingNews*

Code:

update-scripts-kanotix.sh

then run script as normal, the fix is in

clubex - 09.06.2006, 11:59 Uhr
Titel:

Don't understand this!

Does the Breaking News" mean that CC=gcc-4.0 install-nvidia-debian.sh
isn't required as it's been included in a updated update-scripts-kanotix.sh?

devil - 09.06.2006, 12:31 Uhr
Titel:

clubex,
yes, it does, that was an update to the original news by etorix this morning.

greetz
devil

slh - 09.06.2006, 13:22 Uhr
Titel:

Current kernels (2.6.16.20, 2.6.17-rc6) are supposed to get rid of that issue (untested, feedback welcome).

craigevil - 09.06.2006, 13:24 Uhr
Titel:

HUH? What problem is this suppsed to fix?

markb - 09.06.2006, 14:03 Uhr
Titel:

This reads like the second page of a thread - but there ain't no first page?!

C'mon guys, what is this thread about?

etorix - 09.06.2006, 14:13 Uhr
Titel: ***X-Org*** updated,gcc not happy ,film at 11

Error was:

Code:

 #

-> No precompiled kernel interface was found to match your kernel; this means

#

   that the installer will need to compile a new kernel interface.

#

-> Performing CC test with CC="cc".

#

-> gcc-version-check failed:

#

#

#

   The compiler used to compile the kernel (gcc 4.0) does not exactly match the

#

   current compiler (gcc 4.1).  The Linux 2.6 kernel module loader rejects kern

#

   el modules built with a version of gcc that does not exactly match that of t

#

   he compiler used to build the running kernel.

#

#

   If you know what you are doing and want to ignore the gcc version check, sel

#

   ect "No" to continue installation.  Otherwise, select "Yes" to abort install

#

   ation, set the CC environment variable to the name of the compiler used to c

#

   ompile your kernel, and restart installation.  Abort now? (Answer: Yes)

#

ERROR: Installation has failed.  Please see the file

#

       '/var/log/nvidia-installer.log' for details.

This thread is for those who dist-upgraded to the latest Xorg only to find new 3d-drivers failed to build

etorix - 09.06.2006, 14:37 Uhr
Titel: a Gloss to : ***X-Org*** updated,gcc not happy ,film at 11

***X-Org*** = "This is a WARNING"

updated = xorg updated to 7.0.21

gcc not happy - nvidia failed to build [AAARGH]

[or ati] = im not ati-user,but ati-card-drivers wont build either

::fix:: = so heres a fast-fix

*BreakingNews* = and its now in the sripts, update-scripts-kanotix.sh

LIKE THE FACTOID FOR DIST-UPGRADE SAYS

etorix - 09.06.2006, 15:20 Uhr
Titel: RE: ***X-Org*** updated,gcc not happy ,film at 11

and, btw, if you dont know what the thread is about ,why post to it
if you had the error then you know instantly
if you read carefully
and dist-upgrading requires careful reading at every step

ironwalker - 09.06.2006, 21:15 Uhr
Titel: RE: ***X-Org*** updated,gcc not happy ,film at 11

Thank you etorix....well done! Smilie

eco2geek - 09.06.2006, 22:59 Uhr
Titel:

Btw, this issue -- specifically, that you couldn't load the ati/nvidia kernel modules after a dist-upgrade due to a gcc "version magic" error -- got mentioned on IRC and fixed very quickly. Big thanks to etorix and Kano.

In the process, I got hit by a cluebat and realized that OpenGL and GLX are different things, and GLX "direct rendering" isn't enabled on either my nVidia box or my ATI notebook. I haven't done my homework on GLX yet, but if anyone knows a) what "direct rendering" is and what it's good for (other than getting high frame rates in glxgears), and b) how to enable it, I'd appreciate it.

markb - 10.06.2006, 00:02 Uhr
Titel: Re: RE: ***X-Org*** updated,gcc not happy ,film at 11

etorix hat folgendes geschrieben::

and, btw, if you dont know what the thread is about ,why post to it if you had the error then you know instantly if you read carefully and dist-upgrading requires careful reading at every step

I had seen a new xorg 7.0.21 come through on sid yesterday and *before* I upgraded I thought I would come here to check that it was safe. Given that, it *seemed* that the early posts in this thread were something to do with xorg but it just was not clear if there was a problem, what it was about, and whether it was safe to upgrade.

jiro - 10.06.2006, 04:46 Uhr
Titel: Re: ***X-Org*** updated,gcc not happy [or ati]::fix::

etorix hat folgendes geschrieben::

do, before the scriptname

Code:

CC=gcc-4.0 install-nvidia-debian.sh

*BreakingNews*

Code:

update-scripts-kanotix.sh

then run script as normal, the fix is in

updating the scripts didn't work for me. don't know why. but the first fix (CC=gcc-4.0 install-vdidia-debian.sh) worked GREAT! thank you!!

hubi - 10.06.2006, 08:03 Uhr
Titel: Re: ***X-Org*** updated,gcc not happy [or ati]::fix::

Thank you so much etorix for all your vital input, and thank you kano for updating the script. Nvidia installed flawlessly after upgrading to slh's new up-kernel.

hubi

slh - 10.06.2006, 12:17 Uhr
Titel: RE: Re: ***X-Org*** updated,gcc not happy [or ati]::fix::

Actually the new kernels don't need the fix at all (if gcc is up to date), as they're compiled with gcc-4.1 as well Winken

dpdt1 - 13.06.2006, 16:49 Uhr
Titel:

no luck here. neither updating the script (1000 times) nor upgrading today helped. i am using 2.6.16.20-slh64-smp-1 kernel and i think it has something to do with building the fglrx-driver-xorg package.. the output from the script scrolls too fast and i cant check anything there..(something with a lib.gl.... i think). is there someway around that?

p.s. slh, is there no reiser4 support for the 2.6.17.rc6 kernel?