| Autor |
Nachricht |
|
|
Titel: Seamonkey
 Verfasst am: 04.06.2006, 23:56 Uhr
|
|
Anmeldung: 15. Jan 2005
Beiträge: 107
|
|
Hi,
just about to post an appeal to include Seamonkey - then saw the "remove mozilla" thread.
Yes, do remove mozilla.
And put in Seamonkey...
because:
1. Composer I do use for quick work
2. When downloading much stuff (I do a lot of web research and take local copies) Firefox has awkward habit of re-downloading when you "Save As" (try it). This may be slow! Mozzilla didn't, Seamonkey does not. In Mozzilla & Seamonkey, "Save As" gives you the cache copy - the thing you are looking at. Fast and you get what you see.
Seamonkey is fine to use; it is updated and keeps pace with Firefox development.
brodders |
Zuletzt bearbeitet von brodders am 04.06.2006, 23:59 Uhr, insgesamt ein Mal bearbeitet
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
Titel: RE: Seamonkey
Verfasst am: 04.06.2006, 23:58 Uhr
|
|
Anmeldung: 15. Jan 2005
Beiträge: 107
|
|
PS...
Seamonkey covers the main bases, Konqueror is good anyhow. Frankly, with these in a distro you no longer need Firefox .. a space saver? |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Titel: RE: Seamonkey
Verfasst am: 05.06.2006, 06:10 Uhr
|
|
Anmeldung: 13. Mai 2005
Beiträge: 732
Wohnort: Texas
|
|
| Probably need to wait for it to be debianized. |
_________________
Always acknowledge a fault. This will throw those in authority off their guard and give you an opportunity to commit more.
Mark Twain
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Titel: RE: Seamonkey
Verfasst am: 11.06.2006, 20:08 Uhr
|
|
Anmeldung: 29. Mar 2005
Beiträge: 96
Wohnort: Terra
|
|
Just install the Mozilla Linux package, it installs with a couple of clicks and works just fine. The only drawback to Seamonkey is that you have to manually link plugins for it to use them; and creating a Kmenu entry took a couple seconds to find the bin file since its not in the normal place.
I use it mostly for chatzilla which seems to have a memory leak when using it in Firefox.
I would prefer to keep Firefox though.  |
_________________
Easter Rc4 IceWeasel 2.6.18.3-slh-up-1
How to Learn and Use GNU/Linux
My Debian sources.list
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Titel: Re: RE: Seamonkey
Verfasst am: 11.06.2006, 22:45 Uhr
|
|
Anmeldung: 16. Aug 2004
Beiträge: 1905
|
|
|
craigevil hat folgendes geschrieben::
Just install the Mozilla Linux package, it installs with a couple of clicks and works just fine.
That's the most insane thing we could do and I would actively oppose that\0
Besides that there isn't much reason for seamonkey, given that firefox, several IRC clients and even thunderbird are included. |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Titel: Re: RE: Seamonkey
Verfasst am: 11.06.2006, 23:18 Uhr
|
|
Anmeldung: 22. Jan 2006
Beiträge: 1296
Wohnort: Budapest
|
|
slh,
I assist almost anything you say, but nothing can beat the mozilla-suite with the integrated composer. So I'll be swithing to Seamonkey by the time it's in Sid.
OK, I'm using Netscape/Mozilla since good ol' '95, but I still love it. Served me on all platforms without any loss of data, till I switched to KMail.
hubi |
_________________
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Titel: Re: RE: Seamonkey
Verfasst am: 27.07.2006, 03:44 Uhr
|
|
Anmeldung: 08. Dez 2005
Beiträge: 300
|
|
|
craigevil hat folgendes geschrieben::
Just install the Mozilla Linux package, it installs with a couple of clicks and works just fine. The only drawback to Seamonkey is that you have to manually link plugins for it to use them; and creating a Kmenu entry took a couple seconds to find the bin file since its not in the normal place.
I use it mostly for chatzilla which seems to have a memory leak when using it in Firefox.
I would prefer to keep Firefox though.
I think that a Seamonkey Debian package should have a script to set up the links for your plugins... |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
